ComputingBodacious Boxes that go Bing! |
| 20031205(Computing):SCO Misdirection or Redirection? |
I think the details of the SCO debate (statement: Daryl McBride, rebuttal: Lawrence Lessig) is
straying from the original point. While
all this discussion about how the GPL may or may not violate the US
Constitution is interesting, the issue was originally about how IBM
stole some SCO code and placed it in Linux.
The GPL issue appears to me to be an attempt by SCO to cover a
fall-back position -- that is, even if SCO (or someone in one of the
companies they acquired) contributed code with the approval of
whomever was in charge at the time, the resulting code was 'licensed'
under the GPL; and being unenforceable, the release was therefore
illegal. More likely though it is an attempt to muddy the waters and
get a whole lot of free anti-GPL press.
The problem is that you can't separate the GPL from copyright any
more than you can separate Microsoft's license from copyright -- the
same mechanism is what makes those licenses enforceable. The law is
that creators can attach whatever conditions they like to their
creations. The Microsoft position is that you cannot use their
creations in yours, period. The GPL says you can -- but attaches
conditions to the resulting hybrid product. Don't like those
conditions? Don't use the GPL creation in the first place.
Simple. You are under absolutely no compulsion to use the GPL
creation in the creation of your own product.
Why is this such a hard concept for people to wrap their brains around?
As I said, on the face of it there is no reason for the SCO litigation
to attack the viability of the GPL. It is either a distraction, FUD,
or laying the groundwork for an alternative fall-back legal theory we
have not seen yet. In either case, it is a sign that SCO knows that
their efforts are in trouble (witness all the detailed analysis of
their alleged evidence of stolen code).
|
| 20031020(Computing):Spam Control: a user problem |
After careful consideration, I have decided that the burden of filtering
spam should fall on the individual, and on systems directly (and best
exclusively) controlled by that individual.
Read More:You've Got (Junk) Mail |
| 20030924(Computing):Please Get A Clue (Part One) |
Arrrrgh!
You do not, and never have, "logged on" to a public web site. The
phrase "logging on" implies that you are presenting some credentials,
such as a username and password, so that the computer on the other end
will know who you are for the duration of your session.
There are two key deviations from this meaning: first, you don't
present identification to a public web site; they don't know you from
Adam, and they don't care to know you from Adam. Second, as soon as
the icon dealie thing stops changing on your web browser (ie the M in
mozilla, or the spinning e/globe thing in IE) you are disconnected
from the web server. When you click on a link, a completely new
connection is initiated.
It really really irritates me when clueless market-droids invite you to
"log on to our website at www-dot-i-dont-have-a-clue-what-this-means-dot-com".
Makes me cringe.
|
| 20030917(Computing):Vacation Over: Must Work Now. |
Security Wednesday!
- Security Fix: OpenSSH 3.7.1p1
- Critical Security Fix: Sendmail 8.12.10
Other things which happened:
- Bind 9.2.2p1 (anti-VeriSign wildcarding patch)
- Rebuilt the entire DMZ kit about a million times due to
silly syntax errors in the MimeDefang section of the Makefile
(and a self-inflicted full-build-on-RC-releases policy).
I should have rolled in the Apache 1.3.28 release as well, but I'm
chronically lazy. I don't think there are any major bugs with 1.3.27,
so I'll let it slide a little more.
I guess my vacation really is over.
|
| 20030917(Computing):No it isn't |
Hot on the heals of yesterday's article comes a
dissenting opinion.
This hinges on the theory that when someone connects to your computer
for the purposes of copying a song, it is your computer which creates
the copy -- which is aparrently infringement. This is violates the
principle that if the person obtaining the copy is the one making the
copy, then the copy is legal.
No doubt about it, this needs to be tested in court.
|
| 20030916(Computing):The Law Of The Land |
Aparrently, file sharing may be legal in Canada.
Interesting (mandatory NAFTA digs asside).
I knew there was a good reason I was paying too much for blank CDs.
|
| 20030604(Computing):The Definition of Irony |
Irony is leaving a large company because it isn't moving in the
direction you want it to, building a product that takes market share
away from your own employer, who then
buys you.
|
| 20030118(Computing):Redhat 8.0 Sucks |
Bugs found thus far with RedHat 8.0, download edition:
Read More:always buggy |
| 20021105(Computing):More Tales From The Sun Console |
Sun doesn't make anything unnecessarily easy, do they.
Read More:Always More. |
| 20021027(Computing):I hate computers |
This is the kind of thing I spend my days figuring out.
Read More:Arrrrgh! |
| 20021004(Computing):I'm not dead yet, it's just a flesh wound. |
Remember where I said I'd chosen a dead OS for my second computer?
What a difference a couple of months makes! First comes news of
Sun's new intel based
servers which will be available with Linux, or optionally Solaris
9 for x86; and now comes the news that Sun is
going to sell Solaris 9 for x86 separately!
Now I know I'm going to have to find another OS to run. Anyone know where I can find AmigaDOS?
|
| 20020806(Computing):Forward the Future |
I must be a glutton for punishment. Apparently, the complexities and problems
involved in running a Linux system as my main system were not enough for me,
and I have abandoned Linux as a primary computing platform at home.
In favor of a dead OS.
Read More:I love a good funeral |
| 20020217(Computing):Aparrently, I'm an idiot |
The state of Linux today is a culture in deep, deep trouble -- and
the real tragedy is that the movers and shakers of that culture cannot
see the truth of their situation. Those close to the "linux revolution"
are so blind to the state of the art that they cannot see how their
world looks to outsiders and to those just entering for the first time.
Let me step back a minute and tell you a tale of a user and a kernel.
Read More |
| 20011215(Computing):Mandrake Sucks Harder |
In which our hero becomes even more disappointed with his Mandrake system.
Read More:round and round and round the bowl |
| 20011127(Computing):Windows Solution Matrix |
In my quest for computing excellence, I have managed to fuXor up my big
system at home. The fault for this undoubtably lies in my hands, but
I think that Mandrake can take some of the blame.
Read More:lather, reboot, reinstall. |
| 20011120(Computing):A Journey of Enlightenment |
I have undergone a right of passage, a journey from the blind ignorance of the
initiate through to the enlightenment of the acolyte; a transition forced upon
me through a strange set of coincidences, wilful ignorance, and blind stupidity.
And now I know.
But I get ahead of myself.
Read More:a deep lesson of the universe |
| 20010727(Computing):Thoughts On Usability Principles |
Sun did a usability study on Gnome. Ignoring for the moment that they
picked some computer neophytes (primarily unix neophytes), they
ended up with a bunch of usability principles it is worth examining in detail.
Read More:we are sooo user friendly |
| 20010727(Computing):Mundi Mouths More Misleading Muck |
A report on Craig Mundi's panel discussion at O'Reily Open
Source Convention 2001 noted that
...he said that we basically don't see economic reality and
we don't know about business, and while we have good points we should
abandon most of our philosophical ideas.
Read More:but we have the cleanup solution. |
| 20010726(Computing):Change In Email Policy |
Memo
To: all Outlook users
From: the rest of the internet
OK, we've had enough. What was funny when it started with the
Melissa virus has now become painfully annoying with the SirCam
virus.
Read More:877: Sender Is An Idiot, Mail Refused |
| 20010627(Computing):Linux is free? |
Seen on Unix Haters:
Linux is only free if your time is worthless.
My counter opinion:
Well, you are going to end up spending time fucking around with
whatever crap you select anyways, won't you? Linux, Solaris, AIX, or god help you, HPUX
will each cost you tonnes of fiddle-time. Therefore, the time you spend is a cost
of getting the task done -- not of the OS chosen to do the job. Sure, you
could argue that on average you'll spend time on Linux than on something
else -- but since to save that time you'd have to spend money, you can probably
place quite a high value on your time and still come out ahead.
|
| 20010620(Computing):Web Browsers Suck |
Our hero JWZ has some
thoughts about
web page design which are interesting. This is sort of
similar to something I've been thinking about recently, what
with all the Microsoft Smart Tag nonsense going on.
Read More:This site best viewed with your eyes |
| 20010303(Computing):Java Hype Machine |
Over the last six years, I have been watching and reading the various
media hype about Java. Remember Java? Java was going to change the
world. Everything was going to run in a Java Virtual Machine and the
underlying operating system, nay the entire underlying physical hardware,
would be irrelevant. Developers would write once, and users would run
everywhere. Well just in case you are living in a cave, that hasn't
quite happened.
One excellent article on the subject is on salon.com, Simon Garfinkel's
Bad
Java (and the follow-up companion article,
Java
fans fight back) which detail a lot of the lies that the Java Hype
Machine fed the media back in the mid '90s and examines how almost none
of them are true.
Originally published to NerdPerfect.
Read More:what lies?. |
| 20001106(Computing):How To Learn Computers |
K5 has an article today on
how
we might improve technical education. The article is more of a
request for comments than a source of ideas, and it is in the comments
that we do find some ideas which may or may not be worthy of examination.
Being a "computer guy", I get asked by friends and family how they might
go about "learning computer skills". The problem is that there is no
easy, simple answer to this question.
Originally published to NerdPerfect.
Read More:There will be a test later. |
| 20001106(Computing):New Rights for Old Work |
Our good friends at Yahoo! News are reporting that the US Supreme court is
being asked to examine
the
rights that freelancers have in the electronic universe. In a nutshell,
electronic news publishers are claiming that they have the rights to
reproduce freelancer material on the web without seeking the approval of
the original authors. The freelancers, obviously, disagree.
The initial legal exchange has been a draw thus far, with the publishers
winning round one, but the freelancers winning on appeal.
What gets me is the argument being put forth by the representatives of
the publishers.
Originally published to NerdPerfect.
Read More:Sign here to surrender your immortal soul. |
| 20001009(Computing):Compaq Needs A Clue |
Would-be mondo computer manufacturer Compaq added another foot to
their corporate mouth today with comments published in ZDNN to
the effect that
Linux
was risking losing their market momentum because of an inability to move
out of their narrow niche. The article says twice that Linux's
enterprise server role today is limited to being a cost-effective platform
for specific tasks such as mail and print servers. Further, the items
required for Linux to continue progressing in the market are a 2.4 kernel,
a Linux64 project, and something referred to as a "larger skills base".
Uh... what?
Originally published to NerdPerfect.
Read More:How many feet can they get in there? |
| 20000627(Computing):I Hate PDF |
I was reading an article recently -- the exact context escapes me -- and the
author went off on a rant about how these idiots kept sending him MS-Word
documents. "Keep your choices in Word Processors to yourself", he thunders.
As a handy alternative, he proposes the PDF format.
Right.
Originally published to NerdPerfect.
Read More:Share the hatred |
| 20000612(Computing):PalmFuture |
While surfing through some recent history, I discovered this
article:
Visor sales pull ahead of Palm, 1 May 2000 at MercuryCenter.com.
With that and a QuckShot from our intrepid leader a few weeks back, I
got to thinking.
So what is it about handhelds that fascinates geeks? Is it about having
all your friends' email addresses and phone numbers at your fingertips?
Is it about keeping track of your to-do lists, your appointments, your
little scribbles to yourself? Or is it about the hardware.
Originally published to NerdPerfect.
Read More:Holding your future in your hands |
| 20000601(Computing):Spam: It's not just for breakfast any more. |
Just for fun, I read some of the spams that clog my administrative
email box at work. Some of them are real jems -- just when you think
you've seen it all, some other idiot tops them. There are some things
you just can't learn anywhere else.
Read on for today's winner.
Originally published to Nerd Perfect.
Read More:Nutricious and delicious. |
| 19970719(Computing):Why Mackintosh Computers Suck |
One of my less diversity-tollerant screeds.
Read More |